Environmental Data Header Title - Environmental Data

At PFB Corporation, we are concerned with the future of the planet and the effects that modern life styles may be having on climate change. PFB Corporation is committed to conducting its operations responsibly, mindful of the economic, environmental and social impacts of its operations.

PFB reports the material impacts our activity has on the environment. We tabulate and report our emissions, energy usage and waste generated. In 2013 PFB established a Sustainability Committee with members from all areas and specialties within our company. The Committee’s mandate is to work with our management group and employees to facilitate continuous improvement of our sustainability performance. Our focus continues to be on improving our performance through a process of continuous improvement.

Green House Gas (GHG) – greenhouse gases are those gases which contribute to global warming. According to the Kyoto protocol significant greenhouse gases, emitted by human activity, include carbon dioxide (C02), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).

Ozone Depleting Substance (ODS) – A chemical compound that reaches the stratosphere and is capable of reacting with stratospheric ozone causing it to be depleted. Stratospheric ozone protects the earth from harmful UV radiation. PFB does not emit harmful ozone depleting substances from our manufacturing processes.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) – any organic compound that can become vaporized under normal atmospheric conditions. VOC can contribute to the creation of ground level smog around urban centers. PFB releases VOC’s as part of our foam insulation production processes and we are sensitive to this issue and are actively working towards reductions in the amount of VOC’s we emit.

Waste

Waste is a significant issue for manufacturers like PFB both from a cost perspective and its environmental impact. PFB is continually looking for ways to reduce the generation of waste and, wherever possible, reuse and recycle. In 2020 waste to landfill decreased by 8% after 2 years of successive increases; 25% in 2018 and 20% increase in 2019. The improvement in 2020 was attributed to PFB refocusing on recycling efforts and improving methods for tracking the amount of waste material.

The increase in waste to landfill from our operations is a significant cause for concern and we are continuing our efforts to accurately measure, characterize and reduce waste to landfill. Efforts are underway to drill down into the specific issues and determine ways to optimize these processes and take action to reduce waste by diverting scrap materials and waste to alternate recycling opportunities.

Waste to Landfill (Ratio of Total Outputs %)

Energy

Both direct electricity usage and natural gas consumption were down slightly in 2020 over the previous year. Energy consumption has been a significant focus of our individual facilities as we work toward improving efficiencies through installation of energy efficient lighting, equipment and implementing administrative controls for managing equipment operation schedules. Energy consumption efficiency improvement projects and initiatives is being credited for the decrease in electricity and natural gas usage in 2020.

Energy Used in Making PFB Products vs. Energy Saved by Consumers

The energy savings potential from using PFB’s insulating products over the expected lifetime of those products (assumed to be 50 years) exceeds the amount of energy consumed in the manufacturing process by a ratio of approximately 120:1.

Energy Used (MJ/kg by year)

Energy Used in Making PFB Products vs Energy Saved by Consumers108.8107.7108.3109109.8109.2108.9108.6108.5108.8108.613.04KEnergy Used by PFB per yearMJ/kg02010201120122013201420152016201720182020Savings02,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,00014,000Energy Used in Making PFB Products vs Energy Saved by Consumers

(1) Estimated energy savings due to the installation of PFB foam insulation products per unit mass. Estimates based on data in “Energy and Greenhouse Gas Savings for EPS Foam Insulation Applied to Exterior Walls of Single Family Residential Housing In the U.S. and Canada”, Franklin Associates Ltd. February 2009. Energy savings based on reduction in heating when insulation installed as per assumptions in the Franklin report. Note that other insulation materials will provide equivalent reduction in energy and GHG savings if installed to the same level of thermal performance.

(2) Production energy includes embodied energy in raw materials as per “Energy and Environmental Profile of the US Chemical Industry” (May 2000 by Energetics Inc. for US Department of Energy) and direct production energy to manufacture in process raw materials and finished products.

Energy Consumption

We measure and monitor the total amount of electricity and natural gas consumed by our operations. Electricity consumption was down slightly whereas natural gas consumption was up slightly in 2019 compared to the previous year.

Electrical Notes - Electricity (green bars) refer to the right vertical axis, natural gas consumption (blue bars) refer to the left vertical axis. Natural gas refers to Natural gas and biomass to create steam for production process and heat for general building heat and process heat.

Water Consumption

Water consumption was relatively flat year over year in 2020. Previous gains made in water conservation projects in the past continue to provide efficient use of water resources.

Water Consumption (m3)

Water Consumption per Output (m3/tonne)

Emissions

Our focus for the past several years has been to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by using fossil fuels more efficiently. Over the past 10 years, PFB has completed several capital and research projects to substitute raw material inputs with materials that contain less VOC expanding agent. By substituting the raw materials PFB has made significant improvements in our VOC emissions intensity over the past several years.

PFB Emissions Intensity

The key emissions that we track are GHG’s, VOCs, NOx and SOx. We monitor emissions as a ratio of tonnes emitted to tonnes of EPS foam produced. Reductions in the ratios indicate better performance.

Since 2008 we have reduced VOC emissions intensity due to efforts to introduce raw materials with lower VOC content. PFB’s long term plan is to continue converting applications and manufacturing facilities over to the lower VOC raw materials to continuously improve our impact on the environment. In 2008, 13% of our raw materials consumed contained reduced levels of VOCs. In 2010 we successfully increased the usage of low VOC alternative raw material to 59% of the total input. In 2020 the usage of low VOC alternative raw material to 88% of the total resin input. This effort has resulted in an average VOC emissions reduction of over 100 tonnes annually and a total reduction of 1000 tonnes over the past 10 years (compared to emissions from using higher VOC raw materials).

VOC Emissions Intensity (%, per Unit of Output)

Chart Note – A tabulation error we discovered which exaggerated the reported VOC emissions for 2014 through 2017 in previous sustainability reports; this error has been corrected in the data displayed in this 2018 report.

GHG Emissions vs. Savings Potential

Carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas (GHG) emitted from PFB operations, arises from burning natural gas and other fuels in our production operations. We calculate and report GHG emissions in metric tonnes CO2 equivalents. Direct GHG emissions from PFB operations in 2020 were slightly lower than the previous year but emissions intensity was relatively the same year over year.

Our insulating products provide customers with the means to reduce their energy consumption and, consequently, their GHG emissions. The estimated GHG reductions that could be achieved if EPS insulation products made by PFB in 2020 were applied to exterior walls of single family residential houses in Canada would be approximately 50,000 metric tonne annually (a ratio of 5 to 1). Through improvements in the energy-efficiency of our processes we intend to focus on reducing our GHG emissions to further improve the net benefits provided by our products.

GHG Emissions From PFB Operations Versus GHG Savings Potential

GHG Emissions From PFB Operations Versus GHG Savings PotentialEstimated GHG reductions per yearMetric Tonnes of CO2 Equivalents20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020Savings05,00010,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000GHG Emissions From PFB Operations Versus GHG Savings Potential

(1) Estimated GHG emissions reductions potential due to the installation of PFB foam insulation products sold during the reporting year - estimates based on data in “Energy and Greenhouse Gas Savings for EPS Foam Insulation Applied to Exterior Walls of Single Family Residential Housing In The U.S. and Canada”, Franklin Associates Ltd. February 2009. GHG savings is based on reduction in heating when insulation installed as per assumptions in the Franklin report. Note that other insulation materials will provide equivalent reduction in energy and GHG savings if installed to the same level of thermal performance.

GHG Emissions Intensity (per Unit of Output)