At PFB Corporation, we are concerned with the future of the planet and the effects that modern lifestyles may be having on the environment. At the core of our culture, our beliefs are based on sustainable development principles and we are committed to conducting our operations responsibly and mindful of the economic, environmental and social impacts of our operations. We have always placed environmental protection at the highest level of importance in our products, our processes and our practices. We are working hard to insure that “Better Building Ideas from PFB” meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs; both, in the products that we manufacture and in the manner that we conduct all our operations.

Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam products provide architects, builders, contractors and homeowners with a highly effective choice for insulating homes and buildings. The thermal protection provided by EPS insulating materials reduces the consumption of natural resources for heating and cooling and in turn reduces emissions of greenhouse gases.

Many materials including thermal insulation, textiles, furniture and electronic equipment commonly found in homes and buildings contain flame retardants to reduce the effects of fire on people and property. EPS products for construction applications contain low levels of flame retardant (less than 1 % by weight). The flame retardant is incorporated into the expandable polystyrene resin (EPR) raw material used to manufacture EPS products. Until recently, the flame retardant used by most manufacturers of EPR was HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane). Environment Canada and Health Canada published a Screening Level Risk Assessment report of HBCD in November 2011.(1) The report concluded that “HBCD is not entering the environment in a quantity or under conditions that constitute or may constitute a risk in Canada to human life or health” but that HBCD meets the criteria to be labeled as toxic to the environment. Risk assessment by the European Union concluded HBCD contained in EPS foam products poses no risk to workers or to consumers during their service life. However, both Canada and the EU have concluded that HBCD is persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic to the environment. Therefore, as of January 2017 the use, manufacture or import of HBCD or HBCD containing materials is prohibited in Canada.

Anticipating concerns with HBCD, the chemical industry developed an alternative flame retardant and the use of HBCD has now been discontinued in the manufacture of all EPR used by Plasti-Fab. The alternative is a brominated copolymer flame retardant, which has been concluded to have very low environmental toxicity and low bioaccumulation potential, is the now the most widely flame retardant used in the manufacture of EPR. The new brominated copolymer flame retardant has been deemed much safer than HBCD by the US EPA in a special Design for Environment (DfE) report, “Flame Retardant Alternatives for Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD)” published in June 2014.

Click on a topic below to learn more.

Why Use Flame Retardant Health & Environment
What is the alternative flame retardant
and why is it safer than HBCD?
Regulatory Status
   

   Why Use Flame Retardant

CPIA Fact Sheet - Polystyrene Foam Insulation and Green Buildings

All construction materials must adhere to fire safety requirements during their manufacture, transportation and storage. Flame retardant used in EPS insulation allows it to meet building code fire performance requirements for use as a component in building assemblies and permits safe handling and storage. A small amount of highly effective brominated flame retardant is added during the manufacturing of the raw material. Flame retardants work to delay the ignition of polystyrene foam insulation and slow the propagation of flame.

Bromine containing substances continue to be the most effective flame retardants for polystyrene materials. The new safer alternative flame retardant also utilizes bromine’s unique properties. The new flame retardant is safer than HBCD because of its low toxicity and low bioaccumulation rating.

[RETURN TO TOP]

   Health and Environment  

¹ Screening Assessment Report on Hexabromocyclododecane
² EU Risk Assessment

HBCD has undergone a thorough risk assessment by Environment Canada and Health Canada. The report issued in November 2011 concluded HBCD current usage in Canada does not pose a health risk to humans but is harmful to the environment, in particular to aquatic life (see excerpts from the risk assessment report below);

Based on the information presented in this screening assessment, it is proposed that HBCD is entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity.

Based on the adequacies of the margins between estimated exposures to HBCD and critical effect levels, it is concluded that HBCD is not entering the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health.

It is therefore proposed that HBCD meets one or more of the criteria set out in section 64 of CEPA 1999. In addition, HBCD meets the criteria for persistence and bioaccumulation potential as set out in the Persistence and Bioaccumulation Regulations (Canada 2000).(1)

HBCD has undergone a thorough risk assessment for environmental and human health in Europe by the ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency2. The conclusions of this scientific assessment identified no risk to consumers or the general public. HBCD is not classified as a human carcinogen, mutagen or reprotoxic. Concerns surrounding HBCD are related to its toxicity to certain species in the aquatic environment and the degree to which it may bioaccumulate and persist in the environment.

Current information available indicates that HBCD is retained within the EPS polymer matrix and as such does not represent a risk to the environment during the service life of EPS foam products.

HBCD has been identified as a PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic) due to its toxicity to aquatic organisms and its high level of persistency in the environment.

[RETURN TO TOP]

    Regulatory Status  

¹ Screening Assessment Report on Hexabromocyclododecane
² EU Risk Assessment
3. EPA Design for Environment (DfE) Summary Page
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/hbcd_report.pdf.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-06/documents/hbcd_alternatives.pdf

Canada
In Canada, a screening level risk assessment concluded HBCD is toxic to the environment and recommends addition of HBCD to Schedule 1 of the CEPA 1999.1 The report concludes that HBCD meets the criteria for virtual elimination.  As of January 2017 the use, the manufacture and import of HBCD or HBCD containing products is prohibited in Canada.  Plasti-Fab has transitioned all EPS production to the new safer alternative flame retardant.

Europe
European risk assessment completed by Sweden in 2007 concluded HBCD met the persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) criteria. The risk assessment report concluded there is no risk to humans from HBCD contained in polystyrene foams.(2) In 2012 HBCD was placed on the priority substance list with a sunset date of August 2015.

International
Stockholm Convention on POP (persistent organic pollutants has added HBCD to Annex A and will enter into force November 2014.

United States
As part of the EPA’s HBCD Action Plan the Design for Environment (DfE) program conducted a review of HBCD alternatives and published the final report in June 2014(3). The EPA concluded that the brominated polymer alternative flame retardant is safer than HBCD..

[RETURN TO TOP]

   What is the alternative flame retardant and why is it safer than HBCD?

BSEF HBCD Fact Sheet

Download Now
Learn More about BSEF

The alternative flame retardant identified for polystyrene foam is a butadiene styrene brominated copolymer (CAS # 1195978-93-8). This polymeric flame retardant molecule is much larger than HBCD and is not readily absorbed by organisms or humans. The current polymeric flame retardant does not meet PBT criteria because it is not bioaccumulative or toxic. The EPA assessment report “FLAME RETARDANT ALTERNATIVES FOR HEXABROMOCYCLODODECANE (HBCD)”, June 2014, conducted as part of the Design for Environment program concluded;


“The hazard profile of the butadiene styrene brominated copolymer (CAS RN 1195978-93-8) shows that this chemical is anticipated to be safer than HBCD. Due to its large size, lack of low molecular weight (MW) components, and un-reactive functional groups, human health and ecotoxicity hazard for this copolymer are measured or predicted to be low.”

The EPA assessment concluded that the current polymeric flame retardant (butadiene styrene brominated copolymer) has a low level of toxicity and bioaccumulation rating in comparison to HBCD (see excerpt table below).(3)

Definitions

PBT - persistence, bioaccumulative and toxic

Regulatory agencies assess chemical substances based on three criteria; persistence, bioaccumulative and toxicity. Persistence refers to how long a compound, if released, will take to degrade in the terrestrial (land) and aquatic environments. Bioaccumulative refers to the degree to which a compound will remain in living organisms and build up over time. Toxicity refers to the degree to which a chemical has or may have a harmful effect on living organisms.

 [RETURN TO TOP]